Real directors vs AI Slop – Human Pacing Still Wins
There’s “this will change everything” coming from AI news every day. Tons of influencers claiming that “this will end Hollywood”. And sometimes generated videos even look ok on small phone screens. What’s always lacking is pacing, consistency, and a non-AI-generic look on 4K TV screens.
Higgsfield is an AI services aggregator. I don’t use it because of lots of negative reviews online. They sell you the idea of “unlimited” access but then people find out that it becomes “limited” very fast.
But their promo materials are quite fun to watch. Recently they came up with Arena Zero. A 10 minutes video generated with new Chinese model Seedance 2.0 (Yes, the one facing backlash in the USA for allegedly being trained on copyrighted Hollywood movies). The video was generated by 4 directors (from Kazakhstan and Russia) in 4 days. 2 for pre-production and 2 for color-grading, sound and editing. I’m pretty sure there were other designers involved helping generate scenes.
Important part left behind during breakdown:
How many credits did they use? They talk about “5000 decisions”.
Did they have some sort of “unlimited” access without waiting in line?
Is it limited to 720p only? They didn’t talk about upscaling during interviews.
Also from what I see access to Seedance 2.0 right now is only for “business” accounts and “quick business verification required for access” whatever that means. I guess it is to make sure that the company is registered outside of USA to avoid possible future copyright claims.
But it’s the first time I’ve watched 10 minutes of so-called AI slop and didn’t feel bored.
Links to original videos:
Arena Zero from Higgsfield AI
Arena Zero Full Breakdown: Seedance 2.0
If you want to compare and look at influencer generic AI-slop: